Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277825›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2026

Expanding the ethics horizon: integrating African canons for inclusive research ethics in Africa.

Corné Nel, Jacqueline E Wolvaardt, Pieter du Toit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corné NelSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. corne.nel@up.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9917-2408
Jacqueline E WolvaardtSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-8863
Pieter du ToitDepartment of Humanities Education, Division: Higher Education, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-8140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

introductionSociety 5.0 envisions a future where technology and humanity integrate to address societal concerns. In an era marked by significant technological advancements, particularly in artificial intelligence, it is vital to uphold the core values of compassionate care and human connection. While the healthcare sector is central to this transformation, the prevailing research ethics frameworks remain dominated by Western individualism and positivism.

objectiveThis conceptual paper aims to establish a case for integrating African research canons-ujamaa, utulivu, kujitoa, uhaki, and ukweli-into bioethical discourse to create a more inclusive, culturally relevant framework. As a conceptual review, this paper analyses existing Afrocentric paradigms and uses the Bachelor of Clinical Medical Practice (BCMP) curriculum as an illustrative case study of decolonised ethics in practice.

conclusionIncorporating Ubuntu and specific African research canons challenges the Western-centric status quo, fostering a research environment that prioritises communal well-being and harmony. CONTRIBUTION: We can contribute to humanising healthcare by integrating these Afrocentric values, working towards creating a society that is more inclusive and compassionate. The inclusion of African research canons may lead to inclusive and culturally relevant research ethics by shifting the emphasis from Western individualism to a more holistic and human-centred approach.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchAcademiaAfricaCurriculumEmpathyHumansAfrican canonsAfrocentricityHealth sciences educationHuman-centredResearch ethicsSociety 5.0Ubuntu

Identifiers

PMID42277825
PMCPMC13520265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.