Observational studyBMC medical education2026
Ultrasound reliance and landmark-based proficiency in vascular access training: a multicenter cross-sectional survey of anesthesia trainees and teaching faculty in Eastern China.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound guidance has substantially changed vascular access practice, but increasing reliance on ultrasound may be associated with reduced emphasis on landmark-based skills, particularly in resource-limited settings. If reliance on ultrasound is not matched by maintained landmark-based competence, trainees may be inadequately prepared for clinical situations in which ultrasound is unavailable and timely vascular access is critical. We evaluated reliance on ultrasound among anesthesia trainees and examined whether initial training exposure was associated with current technique preference.
methodsIn this multicenter cross-sectional survey, anesthesia trainees and teaching faculty in Eastern China completed questionnaires assessing confidence, technique preference, and training attitudes regarding internal jugular vein (IJV) and radial artery (RA) cannulation. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with technique preference. This study is reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement for cross-sectional studies.
resultsA total of 682 valid responses were analyzed, including 454 trainees and 228 faculty members. Trainees reported greater confidence with ultrasound-guided than with landmark-based techniques (P < 0.001). Initial learning method was the factor most strongly associated with current technique preference: trainees who first learned vascular access using ultrasound were more likely to prefer ultrasound guidance for both IJV cannulation (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 6.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.85-12.11) and RA cannulation (aOR = 5.54; 95% CI, 3.13-9.79). This pattern persisted despite 90.53% of trainees acknowledging the importance of landmark-based skills. In addition, 43.17% reported anxiety about performing vascular access without ultrasound, and 73.25% of faculty perceived declining landmark-based competence among recent graduates. Principal component analysis supported distinct landmark-based confidence constructs for IJV and RA cannulation, whereas ultrasound-guided confidence appeared more generalizable across access sites.
conclusionsAnesthesia trainees showed substantial reliance on ultrasound guidance for vascular access, and initial training exposure was strongly associated with current technique preference. Training programs should maintain structured teaching and assessment in both ultrasound-guided and landmark-based techniques to improve preparedness across varied clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.