Observational studyBMC medical education2026
Current practices in obstetrics and gynecology transition to residency courses: graduates' perspectives on activities, topics, and overall educational benefit.
Observational study in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransition to residency (TTR) courses are increasingly implemented in U.S. medical schools and result in increased confidence among incoming residents (Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 90:1324-1330, 2015, Acad Med 90:1116, 2015). There is limited literature describing TTR courses in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN). This study aimed to characterize the structure, content, and perceived benefit of OBGYN TTR courses.
methodsAn anonymous observational cross-sectional survey was distributed to all residents at 22 OBGYN residency programs between July and September 2024. The 36-item electronic questionnaire assessed residents' participation in an OBGYN TTR course, and if so, its duration, structure, activities, topics, and use of competency-based assessments. Respondents rated the course and individual activities and topics using a 5-point Likert scale and identified the most important topics to include in a TTR course. Descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for analysis.
resultsA total 121 of 552 residents (21.9%) responded to the survey, from the 22 programs to which the survey was sent. Residents represented 73 medical schools from all U.S. census regions. Nearly half of respondents (45.5%) reported receiving no OBGYN TTR course. Most were integrated within a general TTR course and spanned two weeks or less. The most common learning activities were didactic lectures (85%) and surgical skills lab (68%) with residents favoring ambulatory procedure, surgical, and ultrasound skills labs and obstetric simulations. There was a large overlap between topics residents perceived most important to include and those that are currently most utilized. These topics included suturing and knot tying (82%), normal obstetric care (40%), abdominal/pelvic anatomy (40%), and intrapartum care and conduct of normal labor (37%). Few respondents received competency-based assessments such as APGO's PrepForRes quiz (19.1%) or a standardized handover (3.1%).
conclusionsOBGYN TTR courses are inconsistently implemented across U.S. medical schools. Residents perceive greater educational value from experiential learning and from core clinical topics. These findings highlight opportunities to expand and standardize OBGYN TTR curricula, emphasize hands-on learning modalities, and incorporate milestone-based assessments to better prepare graduates for the transition to residency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.