Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277768›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2026

Current practices in obstetrics and gynecology transition to residency courses: graduates' perspectives on activities, topics, and overall educational benefit.

Haley Fox, Cynthia Garvan, Archana Pradhan, Shireen Madani Sims, Bradley Bruggeman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haley FoxDepartment of General Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, Fl, 32610, USA. haley.fox@ufl.edu.
Cynthia GarvanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Archana PradhanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 125 Paterson St, New Brunswick, NJ, 80901, USA.
Shireen Madani SimsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Bradley BruggemanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransition to residency (TTR) courses are increasingly implemented in U.S. medical schools and result in increased confidence among incoming residents (Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 90:1324-1330, 2015, Acad Med 90:1116, 2015). There is limited literature describing TTR courses in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN). This study aimed to characterize the structure, content, and perceived benefit of OBGYN TTR courses.

methodsAn anonymous observational cross-sectional survey was distributed to all residents at 22 OBGYN residency programs between July and September 2024. The 36-item electronic questionnaire assessed residents' participation in an OBGYN TTR course, and if so, its duration, structure, activities, topics, and use of competency-based assessments. Respondents rated the course and individual activities and topics using a 5-point Likert scale and identified the most important topics to include in a TTR course. Descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for analysis.

resultsA total 121 of 552 residents (21.9%) responded to the survey, from the 22 programs to which the survey was sent. Residents represented 73 medical schools from all U.S. census regions. Nearly half of respondents (45.5%) reported receiving no OBGYN TTR course. Most were integrated within a general TTR course and spanned two weeks or less. The most common learning activities were didactic lectures (85%) and surgical skills lab (68%) with residents favoring ambulatory procedure, surgical, and ultrasound skills labs and obstetric simulations. There was a large overlap between topics residents perceived most important to include and those that are currently most utilized. These topics included suturing and knot tying (82%), normal obstetric care (40%), abdominal/pelvic anatomy (40%), and intrapartum care and conduct of normal labor (37%). Few respondents received competency-based assessments such as APGO's PrepForRes quiz (19.1%) or a standardized handover (3.1%).

conclusionsOBGYN TTR courses are inconsistently implemented across U.S. medical schools. Residents perceive greater educational value from experiential learning and from core clinical topics. These findings highlight opportunities to expand and standardize OBGYN TTR curricula, emphasize hands-on learning modalities, and incorporate milestone-based assessments to better prepare graduates for the transition to residency.

Indexed as

GynecologyInternship and ResidencyObstetricsClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesBootcampFourth yearOBGYNResidencyTransition to ResidencyTTR

Identifiers

PMID42277768
PMCPMC13483147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.