ArticleBMC medical ethics2026
Conscientious objection and voluntary abortion in Italy: what has changed in the last two decades?
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundItalian Law 194/1978 allows voluntary termination of pregnancy within the first 90 days and guarantees healthcare professionals the right to conscientious objection (CO). However, concerns have been raised internationally regarding potential barriers to access due to the high prevalence of objecting providers. This study investigates trends in voluntary abortion in Italy over the past two decades, focusing on whether the additional workload for non-objecting gynaecologists is associated with delays in access and later gestational age at the time of abortion, and on the possible role of medication abortion in improving timeliness.
methodsAn ecological study was conducted using official data from the Italian Ministry of Health on voluntary terminations of pregnancy between 1997 and 2022. Indicators included the extra workload of non-objecting gynaecologists, the proportion of abortions performed within 14 days of request, gestational age at abortion, and use of medication abortion. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated at both the national and regional levels.
resultsMarked regional variability emerged across Italy. In 13 out of 21 regions, an increased workload for non-objecting gynaecologists was associated with a lower proportion of abortions performed within 14 days and with procedures occurring at later gestational ages. Conversely, the use of medication abortion showed a strong and statistically significant positive correlation with both timely access and earlier gestational age at termination. These patterns were consistent in both regional and national analyses.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that increased workload for non-objectors may be associated with delays in accessing voluntary abortion services in Italy. Expanding the use of medication abortion may help mitigate some CO-related barriers by enabling earlier and less resource-intensive care. However, this potential benefit depends on adequate service organisation, sufficient non-objecting providers, clear referral pathways, and systematic monitoring, all of which are essential to support the equitable implementation of a legally guaranteed service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.