ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Protocol for the external validation of machine learning models for risk prediction in early-onset preeclampsia: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly-onset preeclampsia (eoPE), defined as preeclampsia occurring before 34 weeks of gestation, remains one of the leading causes of severe maternal morbidity, iatrogenic prematurity, and maternal mortality worldwide. Its heterogeneous and rapidly evolving clinical course makes the prediction of adverse outcomes particularly challenging. Although machine learning (ML)-based models have shown promise in stratifying eoPE risk and supporting clinical decision-making, robust prospective external validation is still lacking. The present study aims to address this gap through a multicenter validation of three ML models previously developed by our group to: (1) predict maternal complications, (2) estimate the likelihood of delivery within ≤ 7 days of diagnosis, and (3) identify the risk of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome or placental abruption.
methodsThis prospective multicenter cohort study (2024-2027) recruits pregnant women diagnosed with eoPE after informed consent. Clinical, analytical, and ultrasound data, including all variables used in the models, are recorded from early pregnancy to delivery. The first 100 cases will undergo quantitative external validation of three ML models and a semi-quantitative evaluation by clinicians, after which these cases will be used to retrain the models. The updated models will then be prospectively applied to the next 100 participants. Model predictions and physician´s assessment of the clinical utility of such predictions are generated through a secure web application accessible only after delivery. DISCUSSION: This study addresses a critical gap in the prospective validation of ML-based tools for eoPE, emphasizing methodological rigor, data quality, and external validation in a multicenter setting. By integrating quantitative performance assessment with clinician-centered evaluation, the project seeks to ensure both statistical robustness and real-world clinical relevance. If successfully validated, these models could support more individualized and timely decision-making in eoPE management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.