Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277749›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Protocol for the external validation of machine learning models for risk prediction in early-onset preeclampsia: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Paula Domínguez-Del Olmo, Iñigo Melchor, Esther Cánovas, Pablo García-Manau, Marc Josep Cahuana, María Pérez-Marqués, Elena Satorres, Fernando Bugatto, Cecilia Villalaín, Eva Robisco and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paula Domínguez-Del OlmoDepartment of Computer Architecture and Automation, Faculty of Informatics, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2169-6011
Iñigo MelchorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria BioBizkaia, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-3180
Esther CánovasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca, IMIB/Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-2219
Pablo García-ManauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2415-1626
Marc Josep CahuanaBCNatal - Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (Hospital Clínic y Hospital Sant Joan de Deu), Institut Clínic de Ginecología, Obstetrícia I Neonatología, Fetal i+D Fetal Medicine Research Center, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-4722
María Pérez-MarquésDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4019-0687
Elena SatorresDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-0737
Fernando BugattoDepartment of Child and Mother Health and Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Cádiz and Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-6541
Cecilia VillalaínSpanish Network in Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Developmental Health Research (RICORS-SAMID), RD24/0013/0015, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9456-4100
Eva RobiscoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
José L AyalaDepartment of Computer Architecture and Automation, Faculty of Informatics, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7236-5330
Alberto GalindoSpanish Network in Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Developmental Health Research (RICORS-SAMID), RD24/0013/0015, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-1474
Ignacio HerraizSpanish Network in Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Developmental Health Research (RICORS-SAMID), RD24/0013/0015, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. ignacio.herraiz@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-4944

Funding

European Regional Development Fund RD24/0013/0015Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI23/01910NextGenerationEU PI23/01910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-onset preeclampsia (eoPE), defined as preeclampsia occurring before 34 weeks of gestation, remains one of the leading causes of severe maternal morbidity, iatrogenic prematurity, and maternal mortality worldwide. Its heterogeneous and rapidly evolving clinical course makes the prediction of adverse outcomes particularly challenging. Although machine learning (ML)-based models have shown promise in stratifying eoPE risk and supporting clinical decision-making, robust prospective external validation is still lacking. The present study aims to address this gap through a multicenter validation of three ML models previously developed by our group to: (1) predict maternal complications, (2) estimate the likelihood of delivery within ≤ 7 days of diagnosis, and (3) identify the risk of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome or placental abruption.

methodsThis prospective multicenter cohort study (2024-2027) recruits pregnant women diagnosed with eoPE after informed consent. Clinical, analytical, and ultrasound data, including all variables used in the models, are recorded from early pregnancy to delivery. The first 100 cases will undergo quantitative external validation of three ML models and a semi-quantitative evaluation by clinicians, after which these cases will be used to retrain the models. The updated models will then be prospectively applied to the next 100 participants. Model predictions and physician´s assessment of the clinical utility of such predictions are generated through a secure web application accessible only after delivery. DISCUSSION: This study addresses a critical gap in the prospective validation of ML-based tools for eoPE, emphasizing methodological rigor, data quality, and external validation in a multicenter setting. By integrating quantitative performance assessment with clinician-centered evaluation, the project seeks to ensure both statistical robustness and real-world clinical relevance. If successfully validated, these models could support more individualized and timely decision-making in eoPE management.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPre-EclampsiaAdultFemaleGestational AgeHELLP SyndromeHumansObservational Studies as TopicPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentValidation Studies as TopicClinical decision support systemMachine learningMulticenterPredictionPreeclampsiaValidation

Identifiers

PMID42277749
PMCPMC13508443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.