ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Digital technology use for social cohesion among older adults in rural Myanmar during the civil war: barriers and coping strategies.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulation ageing in Myanmar is occurring amid prolonged political instability and civil war, exacerbating social isolation and vulnerabilities among older adults, particularly in rural areas. While digital technologies have the potential to support social cohesion, little is known about how older adults in conflict-affected rural Myanmar access and use these tools, the barriers they face, and the strategies they adopt to cope with digital exclusion.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted in rural communities in Kayin State, southeastern Myanmar. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 older adults aged 60 years and above in rural Kayin State, Myanmar. Due to security concerns in the conflict setting, all interviews were conducted online via Zoom. Guided by the Socioecological Model and Stress and Coping Theory, data were thematically analyzed to explore patterns of digital technology use, multi-level barriers, and coping strategies related to social connection during the ongoing civil war.
resultsOlder adults primarily used mobile phones and social media platforms especially Facebook to maintain contact with family members, access information, and support emotional well-being during periods of conflict. These technologies facilitated intergenerational communication, reduced feelings of isolation, and enabled access to timely information related to security and daily living. However, their contribution to social cohesion was often limited by significant barriers, including low digital literacy, financial constraints, unstable electricity and internet connectivity, age-related physical limitations, and concerns about surveillance and phone signal and internet restrictions following the 2021 military coup. Despite these challenges, participants adopted adaptive coping strategies such as relying on family support, sharing devices, and selectively using familiar or low-cost platforms, relocating to access the signals, and adjusting communication practices to avoid surveillance risks.
conclusionDigital technologies provide a limited but meaningful contribution to sustaining social cohesion among older adults in rural, conflict-affected Myanmar by supporting communication, emotional connection, and access to information. However, their contribution remains uneven, as structural inequalities, political constraints, and infrastructural limitations continue to restrict equitable access. Addressing these challenges requires context-sensitive, age-appropriate digital inclusion strategies, alongside sustained investments in rural connectivity and community-based support, to strengthen social connectedness and well-being among older adults in protracted crisis settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.