Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277703›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

Pathogen detection in central nervous system infections: moving metagenomic sequencing closer to clinical practice.

Nicola Cumley, Josh Quick, Thomas Brier, Sam Wilkinson, Chris Kent, Zaki Hassan-Smith, Nicholas Loman, Ghaniah Hassan-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicola CumleyInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9690-548X
Josh QuickInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-871X
Thomas BrierInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3319-2800
Sam WilkinsonInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6944-5927
Chris KentInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4269-0153
Zaki Hassan-SmithDivision of Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-3039
Nicholas LomanInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. n.j.loman@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9843-8988
Ghaniah Hassan-SmithDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK. g.hassan-smith@aston.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5151-9695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCentral nervous system infections (CNSI) contribute significantly to global disability and mortality, but the causative agent is often undetected. Metagenomic sequencing offers the potential to enhance diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in cases of unusual or partially treated infections. However, caution is required in interpretation of metagenomics data due to technical artefacts from contamination or non-specific read mapping which can reveal a broad spectrum of biologically plausible but diagnostically unlikely organisms.

methodsThis study compares the performance of metagenomic sequencing with standard clinical microbiology methods using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with CNSI and non-infected control samples. To evaluate sensitivity of different laboratory approaches, we sequenced DNA and RNA metagenomic libraries extracted from CSF, using both cell-free and cellular fractions. We then devised a set of simple, easily interpreted yet rigorous filters tailored for clinical metagenomics to generate a framework for result interpretation that can be readily applied by clinical scientists.

resultsWe demonstrate that composite filtering strategies are essential to reduce misleading signals and support standardised workflows. Additionally, our results suggest that a cell-free sample preparation approach can improve confidence in identifying clinically relevant pathogens, highlighting the impact of sample preparation on results quality.

conclusionIn this study we describe a reproducible method that can be incorporated into a practical framework for clinical application of metagenomic sequencing in CNSI diagnostics.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System InfectionsMetagenomicsCerebrospinal FluidHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNABioinformaticsCell-freeCentral nervous system infections (CNSI)Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)DiagnosticsMetagenomicsPathogen detection

Identifiers

PMID42277703
PMCPMC13483498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.