ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Development and validation of a deep learning model for automatic detection of depressed skull fractures from CT scans.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepressed skull fractures with bone depression greater than in one cortex might cause major consequences and require surgery in traumatic head injury patients. Therefore, skull fractures with depression in more than one cortex must be identified quickly and accurately.
methodsThis study proposes using a deep learning model to deal with the task. Cranial CT scans of traumatic head injury patients with and without depressed skull fractures were collected for this retrospective investigation. A real-time object detection model, You Only Look Once (YOLO), was adopted to detect depressed skull fractures in more than one cortex. We proposed a two-phase training strategy for training the model. The model was evaluated using internal and external test datasets. The detection performance was reported in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, negative predictive value, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
resultsThe deep learning model demonstrated strong performance on an internal test dataset (accuracy = 0.957); however, its performance declined on two external test datasets (accuracy = 0.884 and 0.857).
conclusionThis model enables automated detection of depressed skull fractures, streamlining the clinical workflow by flagging high-priority cases for expedited radiologist review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.