ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Psychological experiences of patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection during the preoperative waiting period: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency. For patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD, elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair is often preceded by a preoperative waiting period for medical stabilization. During this period, patients face ongoing risks of disease progression while definitive treatment is delayed, creating a distinct context of illness uncertainty. However, the psychological adaptation processes underlying this experience remain insufficiently understood.
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the psychological experiences of patients with TBAD during the preoperative waiting period, guided by Mishel's Uncertainty in Illness Theory (UIT).
methodsA descriptive phenomenological qualitative study was conducted between July and December 2025 at the Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Center of a tertiary hospital in Eastern China. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 17 patients awaiting elective surgery for TBAD. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step phenomenological method.
resultsThe preoperative waiting period was characterized as a dynamic process of psychological adaptation. Four interrelated themes were identified: constructing illness uncertainty, appraisal of the waiting experience, coping strategies, and the dynamics of trust.
conclusionPatients with TBAD experienced the preoperative waiting period as a complex process shaped by illness uncertainty, meaning appraisal, coping strategies, and trust. These findings extend the application of UIT to the context of delayed intervention for life-threatening cardiovascular disease and highlight the importance of integrated psychosocial support during preoperative waiting. Clear and consistent communication, trust-building, adaptive meaning-focused support, and individualized coping interventions may support psychological adjustment during this vulnerable period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.