ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Practical phylogenetic usage of theoretical advances in distance-based tree learning.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many different statistical and computational tools for phylogeny inference are used in biology, but none currently take advantage of a body of theoretical work on fast-converging algorithms, which are designed to guarantee correctness with high probability even when sequence lengths are short relative to the number of taxa. Here, we provide a first implementation of one of the most advanced of these algorithms, and we assess its utility when applied in reasonable biological situations. Our simulation study shows that although the algorithm does report only correct relationships for short sequence lengths, it requires much longer sequences to produce well-resolved trees. We also find that realistic datasets will often not meet the assumptions of the algorithm, but that this largely does not compromise the correctness of the returned trees, though it can reduce their resolution. We additionally provide guidance on how the algorithm can be deployed when the true tree is not known, which is essential for any real-world application. Overall, our intention is to bring a class of algorithmic methods to the attention of the phylogenetics community, and to make the mathematical community aware of needs of practicing biologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.