Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277593›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2026

Do Patients Value the Service Provided by Physicians Who Overbill? A Willingness-to-Pay Study Using French Survey Data.

Karine Lamiraud, Radu Vranceanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karine LamiraudESSEC Business School and THEMA, Cergy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-4908
Radu VranceanuESSEC Business School and THEMA, Cergy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-8269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outpatient specialist physicians in France can work either in the regulated sector, where they charge the regulated fee, or in the unregulated sector, where they set their own fees above the regulated fee. This context provides a unique opportunity to estimate the extent to which patients value services provided under balance billing. In January 2021, we carried out a contingent valuation method (CVM) survey on a sample of 1051 individuals who were representative of France's adult population. Results highlighted that willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a specialist consultation in the unregulated sector was higher than for a consultation in the regulated sector, with a significant WTP difference of €4.30 (almost 15% of the regulated fee). This difference was significant across all respondent subgroups (i.e., gender, age, education level, marital status, income, health status, insurance coverage, and area of residence) and was not fully driven by differences in income. Moreover, this preference for the unregulated sector was associated with the perception that specialists in this sector provide better quality medical care, better quality non-medical services, and that making an appointment with them is easier. Finally, we estimated the patient net welfare gain generated by specialist consultations in the unregulated sector in France at approximately €165 million per year. This is the first study to provide an estimation of patients' benefits associated with balance billing.

Indexed as

Financing, PersonalPhysiciansAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesbalance billingcontingent valuation methodsubjective valuetwo‐sector healthcare marketWTP

Identifiers

PMID42277593
PMCPMC13428617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.