ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Economic Impact of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Head and Neck Surgery Referral Triage.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Economic Impact of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Head and Neck Surgery Referral Triage.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo quantify the comprehensive financial impact from implementing a deep learning algorithm for assistive patient triage within a high-volume Head and Neck Surgical Oncology center operating under a fee-for-service framework.
methodsA prospective cost-benefit analysis compared a deep learning algorithm to standard manual triage on all incoming new patient referrals (n = 214) in one fiscal quarter (FY24 Q3). Financial impact was calculated using a model aggregating two economic components: (1) annualized labor displacement savings, and (2) revenue impact of reallocating verified non-indicated clinic slots to appropriate surgical candidates.
resultsAutomated head and neck referral triage demonstrated a net annual operating gain of $535,989, yielding a 14.9× return on investment. Directly measured labor savings ($236,788.80; 5.6× ROI) represent the conservative estimate; capacity value is modeled, contingent on slot reallocation. The AI-assisted workflow displaces 1951.20 h of manual work (0.94 FTEs) annually per 6-provider division processing 30 referrals/week, and up to 351,936 h (169.20 FTEs) per hospital system. Furthermore, the algorithm's superior accuracy identified 80 verified recoverable clinic slots per year for the division; reallocating these to appropriate candidates generated an additional $6.2 million in downstream revenue.
conclusionThe integration of a deep learning algorithm for Head and Neck Surgical Oncology referral triage delivers substantial financial benefits through the dual mechanisms of direct reduction of administrative labor and the strategic optimization of clinical capacity. By identifying non-indicated referrals, the system allows for the reallocation of limited resources to patients requiring high-acuity surgical oncological care, offering a scalable model for financial sustainability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.