ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026
When Ethics Hurts: The Causes and Impact of Moral Distress on Emergency Department Nurses: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore the extent and range of published research on the nature of moral distress in emergency nurses.
designScoping review.
methodsThe review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were undertaken with a date limit of 2015-2025. Reference lists of included papers were also screened. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, with disagreements resolved through discussion or third-party review. DATA SOURCES: Searches were undertaken in August 2025 in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and PsycINFO.
resultsIncluded studies were across diverse international settings with sample sizes ranging from 169 and 390. Thematic analysis identified four overarching themes: factors contributing to moral distress; situational triggers; the impact of moral distress; and interventions and support strategies.
conclusionThe scoping review identified moral distress as a complex phenomenon that undermines nurse well-being, reduces professional satisfaction, and compromises care delivery. Common causes include organisational constraints and the depersonalisation of care, with demographic and contextual factors shaping experiences. Most studies focused on describing the experience of moral distress. Few studies considered evaluating interventions or organisational supports. No longitudinal studies were identified, and variation in tools limited comparability. Future research should focus on interventions and longitudinal designs to investigate how moral distress evolves in the emergency nurse population over time and across various stages of practice. IMPLICATIONS: Establishing evidence-based strategies to mitigate moral distress is essential for supporting emergency nurses and reducing attrition. IMPACT: This study mapped the literature on moral distress in emergency nurses over the last 10 years. It found that most research focuses on measuring moral distress rather than on interventions to prevent or mitigate it. The review will inform nurse leaders, researchers, educators, and policymakers seeking strategies to further support their staff. REPORTING
methodThis review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered with Open Science Framework and will be publicly accessible following embargo release in January.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.