Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277555›Full record

ReviewJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2026

Systems Science in Nutrition and Dietetics Research: A Practical Lens for Applying Systems Approaches in Research.

Kiara Too, Adam Hulme, Amy Kirkegaard, Mark Robinson, Lauren Ball

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kiara TooCentre for Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2386-519X
Adam HulmeSouthern Queensland Rural Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-8538
Amy KirkegaardCentre for Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7150-5338
Mark RobinsonInstitute of Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4911-7106
Lauren BallCentre for Community Health and Wellbeing, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-0931

Funding

Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting AuthorityAustralian Government RTP scholarshipAustralian Research Council DECRA Fellowship DE240100095Department of Health, Disability and AgeingHealth and Wellbeing Queensland (Australia)King and Amy O'Malley ScholarshipNHMRC Investigator APP 1173496Springfield City Group (Australia); Preventative Health South Australia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research paradigms in nutrition and dietetics research have remained largely hegemonic and reductionistic, leading to interventions that inadequately address complex real-world challenges, such as diet-related chronic diseases. These paradigms have placed emphasis on individual-level interventions that insufficiently account for the evolving individual, environmental, sociocultural and political contexts that shape dietary behaviour and related health outcomes. Viewing topics and problems through a complex systems lens reveals that health and behaviours are influenced by multiple, context-dependent factors that interact and evolve over time. Achieving meaningful improvements in health outcomes therefore requires cross-disciplinary collaboration to build a more complete understanding of a problem and identify the factors and interrelationships driving systemic behaviour over time. The continuing emergence and application of systems science methods highlight the value in reconsidering the application of a complex systems approach to complement traditional research paradigms within nutrition and dietetics research. This paper provides an overview of the opportunities that systems science offers the nutrition and dietetics community and describes how its principles and methods have been used in research, including example areas for future application. Three commonly utilised system science approaches are explored: agent-based modelling, system dynamics, and network analysis. While translating system insights into practice is necessary for achieving real-world change, this paper focuses on practical entry points for getting started in keeping with the aims of this special issue on advancing systems-based practice in nutrition and dietetics. By continuing to embrace systems thinking, the nutrition and dietetics research workforce can strengthen its capacity to understand complexity, design coordinated actions and drive transformative, sustainable improvements in population nutrition-related health.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDieteticsNutritional SciencesSystems AnalysisHumansResearch Designcomplexitynutrition and dieteticsresearchsystems science

Identifiers

PMID42277555
PMCPMC13259970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.