Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277549›Full record

ReviewOncology and therapy2026

Beyond the BCG Paradox: Biological Rationale and Clinical Evidence for Combining Intravesical BCG with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in High-Risk Non-muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Michele Musone, Biagio Barone, Stefano Chianese, Paolo Conforti, Antonio Madonna, Silvestro Imperatore, Fabrizio Dinacci, Raffaele Balsamo, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Roberto Falabella and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Michele Musone *Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology and Urology Unit, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1529-982X
Biagio Barone *Department of Urology, Ospedale San Paolo, ASL NA1 Centro, Naples, Italy.
Stefano ChianeseDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology and Urology Unit, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Paolo ConfortiDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology and Urology Unit, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Antonio MadonnaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology and Urology Unit, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Silvestro ImperatoreDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology and Urology Unit, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio DinacciDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology and Urology Unit, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele BalsamoUrology Unit, AORN Ospedali dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe LucarelliUrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Roberto FalabellaUrology Unit, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy.
Vincenzo Francesco CaputoUrology Unit, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy.
Antonio Luigi PastoreUrology Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Andrea FuschiUrology Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Matteo FerroUnit of Urology, Department of Health Science, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo RomanoDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marco FabianoDivision of Urology, "Antonio Cardarelli" Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Celeste ManfrediDepartment of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Valerio SantarelliDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Felice CrocettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology and Urology Unit, Federico II University, Naples, Italy. felice.crocetto@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-7660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract, with more than 75% of cases diagnosed as non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) remains the gold standard adjuvant treatment for high-risk NMIBC owing to its ability to induce a robust local immune response within the bladder tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients experience disease recurrence or progression, highlighting the need for improved therapeutic strategies. This narrative review examines the biological rationale and available clinical evidence supporting the combination of intravesical BCG with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in high-risk NMIBC. A literature review was conducted to analyze the immunological mechanisms underlying BCG-induced antitumor activity, adaptive immune resistance, and the potential role of ICIs in modulating the tumor microenvironment. Clinical trials were evaluated with particular attention to patient populations, study design, safety profiles, and efficacy end points. From a biological perspective, BCG acts as an immunological primer by recruiting and activating innate and adaptive immune cells, while immune checkpoint inhibitors may counteract functional exhaustion of BCG-induced antitumor responses. However, translation of this rationale into consistent clinical benefit remains challenging. Early-phase studies have reported variable response rates in selected patient populations, particularly in BCG-unresponsive disease. In contrast, recent phase III data have shown that upfront combination strategies do not necessarily translate into improved oncological outcomes. Overall, while the combination of BCG and immune checkpoint inhibition is supported by a strong immunological rationale, current clinical evidence remains heterogeneous and largely derived from early-phase or ongoing trials, precluding definitive conclusions regarding long-term oncological benefit and durable bladder preservation. Despite a strong immunological rationale, the combination of BCG with immune checkpoint inhibitors remains investigational. Its adoption into routine clinical practice will require mature phase III evidence, validated predictive biomarkers, and a clear demonstration of superiority over established bladder-preserving treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Adaptive immune resistanceBacillus Calmette–GuérinBCG-unresponsive diseaseBladder preservationCancer immunotherapyImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunological primingNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancerPD-1/PD-L1Tumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42277549
PMCPMC13575091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.