ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Towards sustainable implementation of robotic surgery: an interregional strategic framework from Norway.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robot‑assisted soft‑tissue surgery (RAS) is embedded in many healthcare systems, yet large‑scale adoption has often proceeded without coordinated governance, resulting in variation in access, training standards, and outcome reporting. This policy perspective summarises the findings and recommendations of an interregional expert group commissioned by Norway's four Regional Health Authorities to develop a strategic framework for sustainable implementation of RAS within a publicly funded specialist healthcare system. Key challenges identified include unclear indication selection, heterogeneous training standards, fragmented procurement practices, incomplete lifecycle costing, and limited systematic outcome monitoring. Core recommendations comprise prioritisation of procedures with demonstrated clinical value, standardised lifecycle cost assessment, coordinated procurement, accredited training pathways, and mandatory data registration. The Norwegian framework illustrates how governance, evidence generation, and workforce planning can be aligned to promote sustainable implementation of robotic surgery. Although developed within a public health system, several principles are transferable to other healthcare contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.