Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277484›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Effects of prediction and attention on tactile precision in somatosensory gating.

Pierangelo N D'Onofrio Pacheco, Eckart Zimmermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierangelo N D'Onofrio PachecoInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Building 23.02, Level 01, Room 41, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. pidon100@hhu.de.
Eckart ZimmermannInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Building 23.02, Level 01, Room 41, Universitätsstrasse 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tactile sensitivity is reduced when the limb is in motion, a phenomenon known as somatosensory gating. In a previous study, we demonstrated that discrimination precision but not perceived intensity differed between active and passive movements. Here, we asked whether and how spatial attention modulates tactile precision in active and passive movements. Participants judged the relative intensity of two vibrations while the arm was still, actively moved, or passively transported by a movable platform. Visual attention was directed either to the movement start or goal position. Perceptual bias was reduced during both active and passive movement, independent of attentional allocation. In contrast, precision remained stable during active movement but declined during passive movement when attention was directed to the movement start. However, when attention was focused on the movement goals, precision was also high when doing passive movements. These findings indicate that during active movements, predictions based, likely on an efference copy, ensure tactile precision, whereas passive movements require spatial attention directed to the movement goal.

Indexed as

AttentionSensory GatingSpace PerceptionTouch PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotion PerceptionMovementVibrationYoung AdultAttention: space-basedGoal-directed movementsPerception and action

Identifiers

PMID42277484
PMCPMC13260218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.