ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Effects of prediction and attention on tactile precision in somatosensory gating.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tactile sensitivity is reduced when the limb is in motion, a phenomenon known as somatosensory gating. In a previous study, we demonstrated that discrimination precision but not perceived intensity differed between active and passive movements. Here, we asked whether and how spatial attention modulates tactile precision in active and passive movements. Participants judged the relative intensity of two vibrations while the arm was still, actively moved, or passively transported by a movable platform. Visual attention was directed either to the movement start or goal position. Perceptual bias was reduced during both active and passive movement, independent of attentional allocation. In contrast, precision remained stable during active movement but declined during passive movement when attention was directed to the movement start. However, when attention was focused on the movement goals, precision was also high when doing passive movements. These findings indicate that during active movements, predictions based, likely on an efference copy, ensure tactile precision, whereas passive movements require spatial attention directed to the movement goal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.