ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Predicting Failure of Active Surveillance in Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis Using Radiomics: An International Multi-center Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundActive surveillance (AS) is the first-line approach for desmoid-type fibromatosis (DTF). However, 30 % of patients require active treatment. Identifying these patients will help upfront to define a personalized treatment approach. This study assessed whether radiomics can predict AS failure in patients with DTF.
methodsThis multicenter study included data from the Netherlands (NL), Italy (ITA), and Canada (CAN). The study included patients with extra-abdominal DTF initially managed with AS and baseline MRI. Tumors were segmented using a minimally interactive deep-learning method, and radiomics features were extracted from T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI scans. Prediction models to predict AS failure versus no failure were created using various machine-learning approaches. Both an internal cross-validation using all available data and an external leave-one-country-out cross-validation were used to assess model performance.
resultsThe cohort included 200 patients (72 NL, 62 ITA, 66 CAN), with AS failing for 26 % of the patients. Internal validation of the T1W+T2W imaging model resulted in an overall area under the curve (AUC) of 0.69 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.79). External validation resulted in an AUC of 0.58 (95 % CI 0.42-0.74) in the Dutch cohort, 0.76 (95 % CI 0.60-0.91) in the Italian cohort, and 0.77 (95 % CI 0.65-0.89) in the Canadian cohort. Adding clinical features did not improve the models' performance.
conclusionsPredicting AS failure with radiomics showed reasonable performance and generalized well to the Italian and Canadian cohorts. Pending improvements to the model or patient selection, the authors' model shows potential to better identify which DTF patients will benefit from AS and which will not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.