ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Feasibility and acceptability of ExerciseGuideUK for those living with and beyond lung cancer: a mixed methods study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05121259 (Feasibility and Acceptability of an Online Web-based Physical Activity Program, for Those Living With and Beyond Lung Cancer.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility and Acceptability of an Online Web-based Physical Activity Program, for Those Living With and Beyond Lung Cancer.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDigital health interventions offer promise for addressing unmet needs in individuals living with and beyond lung cancer (LWBLC). ExerciseGuideUK, a personalised, web-based exercise platform, was developed for those LWBLC. This study aimed to evaluate ExerciseGuideUK.
methodsParticipants were recruited from Hull University Teaching Hospital and used ExerciseGuideUK over eight weeks. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed using quantitative measures, including the System Usability Scale, structured questionnaires, and qualitative interviews (guided by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability). A novel mixed-methods integration approach called the Pillar Integration process (PIP) was used to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings on feasibility, engagement, barriers, and adaptation potential.
resultsEighteen participants (mean age 65 ± 14.42y) enrolled. Recruitment and retention rates were 30.5% and 77%, respectively. Notably, 25.4% of those screened were excluded due to digital access issues, including some participants who owned smartphones, suggesting limited digital literacy. Among those who participated, acceptability, usability, and engagement were high. Valued features included goal-setting tools, breathlessness management strategies, and personalised exercise prescriptions. Barriers included treatment side effects, work responsibilities, and low confidence with technology.
conclusionExerciseGuideUK showed moderate feasibility and high acceptability among users. This is the first known application of PIP in the context of lung cancer, exercise, and digital health. The PIP facilitated a comprehensive understanding of feasibility and acceptability, guiding informed adaptations by users. The PIP warrants further testing and refinement in relation to optimising digital intervention design that promotes equitable, patient-centred care.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05121259.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.