ReviewNature protocols2026
An immunocompetent bone marrow-on-a-chip model for studying human hematological malignancies and preclinical therapeutic screening.
Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complex pathophysiology of leukemia and other bone marrow-related hematological malignancies underscores the critical need for immunocompetent bone marrow models that can accurately recapitulate key disease microenvironment and patient therapeutic responses. Existing bone marrow models often lack the fidelity required to recapitulate patient-specific pathophysiology or to emulate the intricate dynamics of in vivo immune responses. This limitation ultimately constrains their utility in critical areas such as leukemia immunotherapy development. Here, to overcome this challenge, we present a detailed protocol for building a 3D microfluidic human bone marrow-on-a-chip microphysiological system that recapitulates the anatomical organization and function of the native tissue. Its concentric three-compartment design replicates the marrow's spatial architecture, co-culturing stromal and hematopoietic cells within a vascularized niche to establish a physiologically relevant, immunocompetent microenvironment. To model patient-specific biology, the platform incorporates patient-derived samples, enabling the personalized evaluation of therapeutic interventions such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and chemotherapy. The platform supports multiplexed readouts through live imaging, immunofluorescence, cytokine profiling, flow cytometry and single-cell sequencing, enabling a comprehensive analysis of treatment response. The protocol requires ~7 d to establish the functional bone marrow chip, comprising microfluidic device fabrication (1 d), cell seeding (1 d) and progressive development of the bone marrow model (5 d). Therapeutic testing is conducted over a variable timeframe, typically ranging from 2 d to 14 d. The protocol is designed for researchers with basic experience in cell culture and fluorescence imaging,who have basic microfluidics fabrication and tissue culture experience.
Identifiers
42277440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.