Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277439›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026

Proposed Conditions for Pain Reprocessing Therapy Readiness: Beyond Phenotyping Neuroplastic Pain.

Alexandra Thérond, Louisia Starnino, Christopher L Robinson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra ThérondDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada. therond.alexandra@courrier.uqam.ca.
Louisia StarninoDepartment of Anesthesia, Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montréal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada.
Christopher L RobinsonDivision of Pain, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis paper examines the clinical gap between identifying neuroplastic pain and achieving treatment success with Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT), proposing a structured readiness framework to guide clinicians in determining when patients are appropriately positioned to engage with this intervention for chronic primary pain. RECENT

findingsDespite a randomized controlled trial demonstrating that approximately 66% of PRT participants achieved pain-free or nearly pain-free status at one year, no implementation guidelines exist for establishing patient readiness prior to initiating treatment. This paper proposes ten conditions across four domains: patient cognitive readiness, patient behavioral readiness, provider alignment, and system-level factors. Evidence from pain neuroscience education, the fear-avoidance model, stages of change literature, and therapeutic alliance research supports the theoretical grounding of each condition. Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy is proposed as an adjunctive intervention for patients whose pain is sustained by unresolved trauma or emotional inhibition beyond the reach of cognitive reattribution alone. Neuroplastic pain identification is necessary but may be insufficient for PRT success. Unmet readiness conditions spanning cognition, behavior, provider practice, and healthcare systems may explain a meaningful proportion of limited treatment responses. These proposals require empirical validation before clinical adoption and should be treated as hypotheses to guide implementation research rather than established practice guidelines.

Indexed as

Chronic PainNeuronal PlasticityPain ManagementHumansChronic primary painIatrogenic effectsMultidisciplinary pain careNeuroplastic painPain reprocessing therapyTreatment readiness

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.