ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Association and risk prediction of 19 complex diseases with polygenic scores and socioeconomic status.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferences in disease risk are linked to inherited genetic variation and social circumstances, but how these factors jointly relate to multiple diseases is not fully understood. This study investigates the independent and combined associations of genetic predisposition and socioeconomic status with common diseases.
methodsWe analyzed data from 743,194 adults from three biobank studies in Finland and the United Kingdom, including European and non-European ancestry individuals. Genetic predisposition was measured using polygenic scores for 19 common diseases. Socioeconomic status was assessed through education and occupation. We evaluated associations of genetic and socioeconomic factors with disease risk and whether genetic associations differed across education levels. Models including both genetic and educational factors were compared with models including only one factor and models including their interaction.
resultsHere, we show that both genetic predisposition and socioeconomic status are associated with disease risk across most conditions. For seven diseases, genetic associations are stronger in highly educated groups, while occupation shows smaller differences. Patterns are generally consistent across ancestry groups, though education associations are less stable in non-European individuals. While both education and polygenic scores independently improved prediction, combining both provided additional modest improvement to prediction for 16 and 12 out of 19 diseases in FinnGen and the UK Biobank, respectively.
conclusionsGenetic variation and social circumstances are linked to differences in disease risk both independently, and in combination with one another. Considering both factors modestly improves identification of higher-risk groups and highlights the value of accounting for social context alongside inherited variation in population-level assessments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.