ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing spatio-temporal coupling between intangible cultural heritage and rural development in China (2013-2022) through coupling coordination analysis and random-forest prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study analyzes panel data from 31 provinces in China spanning 2013 to 2022, employing the entropy value approach and the coupling coordination degree model to assess the coupling coordination level between intangible cultural heritage and rural development. Data sourced from the China Cultural Heritage and Tourism Statistical Yearbook, the National Bureau of Statistics of China, and other official data. This study analyzes the dynamic development and spatial relationship between the two with the help of the Moran's I index, kernel density estimation, and Markov chains. Second, using the variable indicators of both as targets, a random forest model was employed to predict the results. Stability recommendations were derived by altering the number of seeds and splitting the training set. The results indicate the following: (1) Analysis of the coupling model reveals that the coordination level between intangible cultural heritage and rural development exhibits a high degree of alignment. Spatially, the results show a pattern of "higher in the east, lower in the west, with central and northeastern regions in between" across provinces. (2) The Moran's I index indicates stable spatial hierarchy, though it also generates mobility similar to other adjacent tiers. (3) The kernel density model shows narrowing and widening states after peaking in 2022, revealing a trend of diminishing differentiation. (4) The random forest analysis demonstrates that intangible cultural heritage inheritors rank first in density metrics. Both indicators will continue to show positive growth, albeit at high speeds with slow development margins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.