ReviewOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
Support for Older People With Vision Impairment: A Rapid Realist Review.
Review in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Support for Older People With Vision Impairment: A Rapid Realist Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVision impairment among older adults is a significant public health issue impacting their physical and mental health and overall quality of life. However, access and navigation of support services are inconsistent and lacking. Recognising the need to gain insight to improve access to services in this population, this review aimed to understand how, why, for whom, to what extent and in what context the provisions for care and support for older people with vision impairment worked.
methodsA rapid Realist review was undertaken. Six databases (Cinahl, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Social Services Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts and Sociology Collection) were searched. The review followed the RAMESES Quality Standards for Realist Synthesis and retrieved documents were screened systematically to identify relevant papers. The papers were analysed through iterative and simultaneous use of coding, consolidating and conceptual mapping process to develop a Realist programme theory. Project Advisory Group members contributed to the processes. The Realist review was conducted from July 2023 to July 2024.
resultsNinety-one documents were reviewed and analysed. Novel insights into the provisions of care and support for older people with vision impairment were presented through seven interconnected components: Developing condition literacy, acceptance of the condition and readiness for help, timeliness, access to services, relationships, positive care trajectory and professional knowledge. All contributed to the development of the Programme Theory.
conclusionThe Programme Theory explained why and for whom the services worked, while limited information was found in terms of how and when the services were accessed. The key components identified around the Programme Theory were complex and interconnected in nature, underscoring the importance of a systems approach to effective service provision for older adults with vision impairment. Literature gaps were identified for further exploration in a Realist evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.