ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable machine learning distinguishes skip from continuous metastasis in N1b papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skip metastasis-defined as lateral lymph node metastasis(N1b) in the absence of central lymph node involvement-represents a distinct yet underrecognized metastatic pattern in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Accurate identification of skip metastasis is clinically important. However, reliable tools to distinguish skip from continuous metastasis in N1b PTC remain limited. We developed and validated prediction models to discriminate skip from continuous metastasis using a multi-cohort design. A retrospective cohort of 739 patients with N1b PTC who underwent routine bilateral CND with lateral neck dissection was used for model development. Ten machine learning algorithms were trained using clinically available variables and evaluated through internal validation and two independent external validation cohorts. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, clinical utility, and risk reclassification. Model interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Skip metastasis was identified in 14.2% of N1b PTC patients. Among all candidate models, the XGBoost algorithm consistently demonstrated superior and stable discrimination across development and validation cohorts, achieving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves. Calibration analyses showed good agreement between predicted and observed risks, and decision curve analysis demonstrated a favorable net clinical benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Compared with alternative models, XGBoost provided significant improvements in patient-level risk stratification, as reflected by positive net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement in both internal and external validations. SHAP analyses revealed that the number of central lymph nodes dissected, number of metastatic lateral lymph nodes, tumor location, age, and tumor size were the most influential predictors, capturing clinically coherent and non-linear risk patterns. We developed and externally validated an interpretable and clinically deployable machine learning model to distinguish skip from continuous metastasis in N1b PTC. This model enables individualized risk assessment and may support tailored surgical decision-making. Larger and more prospective studies are warranted to evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.