ArticleMycotoxin research2026
Natural occurrence of ustiloxin A and D in rice in China.
Article in Mycotoxin research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rice, a staple food for more than half of the global population, undergoes multiple processing stages-such as harvesting, dehulling, milling, and polishing-before it reaches consumers. However, these processes not only alter the physical and nutritional characteristics of rice but may also affect the distribution and concentration of contaminants, thereby posing potential safety and quality risks. In this study, a total of 231 unhusked rice samples were collected from three provinces(Jiangsu, Anhui, and Fujian)in China between 2016 and 2018, along with 11 white rice samples purchased from supermarkets in 2018, and analyzed for the presence of ustiloxin A and D. After dehulling, 31.6% and 5.6% of the brown rice samples were found to be contaminated with ustiloxin A and D, respectively, while neither toxin was detected in the 11 white rice samples obtained from the market. The occurrence of ustiloxin A and D was higher in middle-late rice ecotypes than in the early rice ecotype, with the highest frequency observed in japonica-type rice. Geographically, Jiangsu Province had the highest incidence of ustiloxin A, whereas Anhui Province showed the highest occurrence of ustiloxin D. Importantly, the concentrations of both ustiloxins were higher in unhusked rice than in brown rice and white rice, underscoring that processing can significantly reduce, though not completely eliminate, contamination risks. These findings highlight the importance of continuous monitoring and further investigation into the transfer dynamics of contaminants during rice processing to ensure the safety of the final product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42277351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.