ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
A systematic review of explainable artificial intelligence and cardiac electrophysiological models addressing sports-related sudden cardiac death and arrest in adolescents and young adults.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) is a fatal event occurring within one hour of a witnessed or 24 hours of an unwitnessed Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA), being the leading medical cause of death among adolescent and young adult athletes. We examined the epidemiology of sports-related SCD (SrSCD) and SCA (SrSCA) incidence in adolescents and young adults, explainable Artificial Intelligence (xAI) applied to life-threatening arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiological models. We systematically searched peer-reviewed studies from eight databases between 2013-2025 (PROSPERO: CRD42024565960), using PROBAST for bias assessment. From 9574 studies, we included 84 (incidence: 16, xAI: 30, modelling: 38). SrSCD incidence ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 per 100,000 participants per year. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping dominated as xAI technique. Cardiac electrophysiological models predominantly focused on cellular and tissue-level electrophysiology. We advocate for standardised SrSCD/SrSCA definitions and integration of epidemiological risk factors with xAI and cardiac modelling frameworks to advance athlete-specific risk stratification.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.