ArticleScientific reports2026
Tribological performance of Al5052/B₄C/Granite hybrid composites: machine learning prediction and multi-response optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the sustainable wear performance of Al5052/B₄C/granite hybrid composites produced by the stir casting process. Wear tests were executed on a pin on disc by varying load from 20 N to 50 N and sliding speed from 2 m/s to 3 m/s to evaluate the specific wear rate (SWR) and coefficient of friction (COF). From the results, the lowest specific wear rate of 0.201 × 10⁻³ mm³/Nm was obtained at 20 N load, 2 m/s sliding speed, and 4 wt% granite reinforcement. SEM analysis of worn surfaces revealed small cracks and minimal wear debris, indicating low fatigue wear and better resistance to surface degradation. ANN, ANFIS, and LightGBM models were also used to predict wear performance. LightGBM showed the highest accuracy, with R² values of approximately 0.9992 for SWR and 0.9987 for COF. ANOVA confirmed that sliding speed was the most significant factor affecting both responses. The Composite Desirability Function (CDF) was employed to identify the best parameter combination for reducing both SWR and COF. According to CDF results, the optimum conditions were 32.12 N load, 2.0 m/s sliding speed, and 6 wt% granite reinforcement. Under these settings, the predicted minimum COF was 0.4129 with desirability of 0.92346, and the predicted minimum wear rate was 0.3229 with desirability of 0.93323. Overall, this study demonstrates that granite powder can be effectively used as a sustainable reinforcement to improve the wear resistance of Al5052-based hybrid composites for industrial tribological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.