ArticleScientific reports2026
Group B Streptococcus antibiotics treatment during pregnancy and the risk of four neurodevelopmental outcomes in Swedish children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested an association between prenatal and early life antibiotics with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. As antibiotics during pregnancy are commonly prescribed, our aim was to estimate the association the groups of antibiotics prescribed for GBS during pregnancy the risk of neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. This population-based cohort study included all live births in Sweden from 2006 to 2016 (n = 1,066,777). Individual informed consent was not required, as the study used data from national registers and involved no direct participant contact. Using multivariable Cox Regression models and GEE models for secondary assessment we measured the association between seven first line treatment GBS antibiotics during pregnancy and (1) intellectual disability, (2) cerebral palsy, (3) autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and (4) attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD) as recorded in high-quality Swedish registers. GBS antibiotics were prescribed to 22.1% of mothers included. We found no association between GBS antibiotics and the risk of intellectual disability. However, a modest association was observed for cerebral palsy (aHR 1.17, 95%CI 1.06-1.29), ASD (aHR 1.12, 95%CI 1.07-1.17), and ADHD/ADD (aHR 1.17, 95%CI 1.12-1.22). This association was also seen when only including children born at term, and only children of mothers without autism spectrum disorder or ADHD diagnosis. The results were model dependent, as GEE models did not always show the same associations. Although the results could be affected by residual confounding or confounding by indication (as GBS infection has been associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes), they highlight the need for further studies on GBS antibiotic use during pregnancy, increased antibiotic stewardship with individual risk assessment and other treatment options for GBS, when needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.