ArticleDysphagia2026
Normative Data of Healthy Adults on the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids (ToMaSS) with Domestic Crackers.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding masticatory performance holds significance in diagnosing dysphagia and monitoring outcomes of interventions targeting primarily the oral preparatory phase of swallowing. The Test of Mastication and Swallowing Solids (ToMaSS) is a validated quantitative tool that clinically evaluates mastication and ingestion of solid food. Previous studies established normative values for commercially available crackers across countries. The current study aimed to provide local normative data using commercially available cracker in the healthy Chinese Asian population. 268 participants (21 to 95 years) participated in the normative data acquisition with the Pacific™ Saltine Cracker. ToMaSS parameters (number of bites, number of masticatory cycles, number of swallows, and ingestion time) were measured via review of video recordings. The study reported the normative data of ToMaSS parameters from 247 participants. Statistically significant main effect of age and gender was found, with males exhibiting fewer number of bites (p < .001), fewer masticatory cycles (p = .003), fewer number of swallows (p = .02) and shorter ingestion time (p < .001) than females; and age effect on all parameters (p < .05) except number of swallows. Although statistically significant, posterior functional tooth units (FTU) demonstrated only weak inverse correlations with most ToMaSS parameters except number of swallows, suggesting that reduced posterior occlusal contact may compromise masticatory performance to a small extent. The findings provided insights into the masticatory performance of healthy Chinese Asian population. The normative data could serve as benchmark values in understanding the ingestion behavior of solid food in this population, and in detecting the functional change in swallowing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42277297What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.