Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42277295›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2026

Investigation of the Impact of Preoperative Swallowing Therapy on Swallowing Function in Partial Laryngectomy.

Çağla Eliküçük, Fatma Esen Aydınlı, Elvan Evrim Ünsal Tuna, Aydan Dumbak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Çağla EliküçükDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey. cagladinsever@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5578-6192
Fatma Esen AydınlıDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Elvan Evrim Ünsal TunaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Aydan DumbakAdult Acute Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial laryngectomy can substantially compromise swallowing safety and efficiency, leading to reduced swallowing-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Although postoperative swallowing therapy is effective in managing dysphagia, postoperative pain, fatigue, and anatomical alterations may limit early rehabilitation adherence. This study aimed to investigate whether structured preoperative swallowing therapy enhances postoperative swallowing recovery in patients undergoing partial laryngectomy. Thirty patients with HNC were included. The study group (n = 16) received both preoperative and postoperative swallowing therapy, while the control group (n = 14) received postoperative therapy alone. Preoperative therapy was delivered using an individualized, Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)-guided protocol specified according to the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS), targeting airway protection, swallowing efficiency, and preparation for postoperative rehabilitation. Postoperative swallowing therapy content, timing, and dosage were fully standardized between groups. Swallowing function was assessed preoperatively and at postoperative days 5-7, and at 1, 3, and 6 months using FEES. Penetration-aspiration severity was evaluated via the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) across all International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) consistencies, and pharyngeal residue was assessed using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Functional oral intake and swallowing-related quality of life were assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35). Both groups demonstrated significant postoperative improvements over time. However, patients receiving preoperative swallowing therapy achieved significantly higher FOIS levels at earlier postoperative time points (p = 0.018 to < 0.001), showed greater reductions in penetration-aspiration severity (p = 0.001-0.031) and pharyngeal residue (p < 0.001-0.050), and reached functional oral intake significantly earlier than controls (10.44 ± 1.50 vs. 24.36 ± 3.77 days, p < 0.001). Nasogastric tube duration was also shorter in the study group (9.25 ± 2.10 vs. 20.40 ± 3.80 days, p < 0.001). These improvements were also reflected in EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 scores, with earlier recovery in functional domains and reduced symptom burden in the study group. In conclusion, structured preoperative swallowing therapy significantly accelerates postoperative swallowing recovery, improves airway protection, reduces postoperative enteral feeding dependence, and facilitates earlier return to oral intake following partial laryngectomy. These findings support the integration of structured preoperative swallowing therapy into routine perioperative dysphagia management for patients undergoing partial laryngectomy.

Indexed as

DysphagiaFEESPartial laryngectomyPreoperative swallowing therapyRehabilitation Treatment Specification System

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.