ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive fuzzy-reinforcement framework for real-time task scheduling and resource optimization in medical edge computing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a hybrid fuzzy-reinforcement learning framework for real-time task scheduling and resource optimization in medical edge computing. The proposed framework introduces a direct mathematical coupling between fuzzy inference and reinforcement learning rather than a simple hybrid combination. By integrating fuzzy logic to evaluate task urgency, bandwidth congestion, and battery constraints with a reinforcement learning agent, the framework dynamically refines offloading strategies. Simulation results in Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) environments demonstrate the framework's superiority over existing benchmarks, achieving up to 42% lower average latency, 31% greater energy efficiency, and up to 20% improvement over Dynamic Priority-Based Task Scheduling and Adaptive Resource Allocation (DPTARA) under the evaluated benchmark settings in the completion rate of critical tasks. Operating with a linear time complexity of [Formula: see text] the proposed system guarantees scalable and robust performance for delay-sensitive healthcare applications. Experimental results across four benchmark IIoT healthcare datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. Specifically, the model achieves average accuracy improvements of 2.8-4.6% over state-of-the-art baselines, while reducing false negative rates by up to 35.4%. In addition, the proposed fuzzy-reinforcement learning scheduler decreases average task latency by 23.7%, improves resource utilization by 18.9%, and enhances system adaptability under dynamic workload conditions. These results confirm the framework's robustness, scalability, and suitability for real-time medical edge computing environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.