ArticleScientific reports2026
Biomechanical stability evaluation of isolated straddle fracture using finite element analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Straddle fractures, bilateral fractures of the superior and inferior pubic rami, are considered mechanically stable when the posterior pelvic ring remains intact. However, progressive displacement or delayed union, even in isolated straddle fractures, raise concerns about their true biomechanical stability. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the biomechanical stability of isolated straddle fractures with an intact posterior pelvic ring using finite element analysis based on computed tomography-derived three-dimensional pelvic models. Two models were developed: model A, an isolated straddle fracture model with an intact posterior pelvic ring; model B, a posterior fracture model with sacroiliac joint fracture. Under a 600 N axial load, model A exhibited a maximum displacement of 2.03 mm within the physiological safety limit and a maximum von-Mises stress of 100.6 MPa, lower than the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the cortical bone (110 MPa). Conversely, model B exhibited severe instability, with a displacement > 50 mm and a stress surpassing the UTS. Model A maintained biomechanical stability under a 600 N bending load and 10 Nm torsional moment, with displacements < 2 mm and stresses remaining below the UTS. These findings indicate that an intact posterior pelvic ring provides sufficient biomechanical stability for isolated straddle fractures, supporting conservative management when posterior ring integrity is maintained. In contrast, injury to the posterior pelvic ring results in severe mechanical instability, emphasizing its crucial role in pelvic load transfer. Collectively, this quantitative biomechanical evidence refines traditional treatment principles for isolated straddle fractures and supports clinical decision-making in pelvic ring injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.