ArticleScientific reports2026
Macroevolutionary trends of avian ichnodisparity in Gondwana.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The concept of ichnodisparity is herein introduced for the study of fossil vertebrates, using Gondwanan avian footprints. We define ichnodisparity for trackways as the qualitative variation in morphological patterns of autopodial impressions, most likely reflecting functional or ecological thresholds. Foot architectural designs are defined based on anatomical features, including digit number and orientation and interdigital webbing, and size. Ichnodisparity in fossil bird tracks is proposed here as a useful proxy for analyzing evolutionary radiations and characterizing macroevolutionary patterns. Twenty-three geological formations from Gondwana were analyzed, spanning from the Early Cretaceous to the Late Pleistocene. The earliest morphotypes were predominantly large-sized, while small morphotypes became dominant over time. No zygodactyl footprints are recorded from Gondwana. Prior to the K/Pg boundary, ichnodisparity was high, consistent with a Cretaceous avian radiation. During the Eocene, morphological variety remained comparable to that of the Late Cretaceous - except for the large tridactyl design - suggesting ecological turnover rather than functional expansion; elevated ichnodisparity may be associated with the Early Eocene Climatic Optimum. The decline recorded in the Oligocene is likely attributable to sampling bias. The Miocene concentrates the highest ichnodisparity in the fossil record, with the reappearance of large pedal architectures linked to cursorial birds, supporting an expansion into open spaces. In the Pleistocene, small tridactyl forms disappeared and the large palmate architecture emerged for the first time, indicating a new episode of ecological turnover.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.