ArticleScientific reports2026
An advanced framework for predicting pollen outbreaks using multi-input multi-output temporal convolutional networks and firefly algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pollen outbreaks pose serious public health concerns, especially for those with respiratory problems. Reliable detection systems, which provide timely interventions, are essential to mitigate these risks. This work presents novel pollen outbreak prediction by integrating Multi-Input Multi-Output Temporal Convolutional Networks (MIMO-TCN) with Firefly algorithm for optimal hyperparameter tuning. It presents a technique that uses the Firefly Algorithm (FA) for hyperparameter tweaking in conjunction with the Multi-Input Multi-Output Temporal Convolutional Networks (MIMO-TCN) architecture. The FA, inspired by firefly communication and mating habits, excels at optimization challenges. We ran extensive trials on a dataset of 20,000 to 100,000 instances, testing the model using measures including accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and F1 score. The model beat various state-of-the-art algorithms, with an average precision of 0.965, sensitivity of 0.982, F-measure of 0.973 and accuracy of 92.04%. Confusion matrix analysis demonstrated strong performance across pollen types (Tree, Grass, and Weed), emphasizing the model's classification accuracy and real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.