ArticleScientific reports2026
Ceramic art design generation and aesthetic quality evaluation based on multimodal large language models and diffusion probabilistic framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ceramic art design faces persistent challenges in balancing cultural authenticity with production efficiency, as conventional workflows rely heavily on subjective artisan expertise. This paper presents a unified framework that integrates multimodal large language models with diffusion probabilistic models for surface-decoration generation and computational visual-aesthetic proxy evaluation of vessel-based ceramic objects, with a dataset predominantly drawn from Chinese ceramic traditions. The framework comprises three coupled modules: a multimodal semantic parsing module that extracts structured design attributes from textual briefs or reference images via instruction-tuned vision-language modeling augmented by a ceramic domain knowledge graph; a style-conditioned diffusion generation network employing cross-attention semantic injection and adaptive layer normalization to synthesize ceramic designs under fine-grained stylistic control; and a multi-dimensional aesthetic quality evaluation model that scores generated outputs across compositional rationality, color harmony, texture fineness, and style consistency using attention-weighted adaptive fusion calibrated against expert judgment. Experiments on a purpose-built dataset of over 21,000 annotated ceramic images spanning five major traditions centered on Chinese porcelain and stoneware demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a FID of 28.35 and an IS of 10.46, substantially outperforming existing baselines. The aesthetic evaluation model attains an SRCC of 0.891 and a PLCC of 0.903 against expert ground truth. We explicitly acknowledge that the framework operates on two-dimensional imagery and does not model three-dimensional form, clay-body or glaze material composition, or firing dynamics; the reported aesthetic scores therefore reflect computational proxies of visual properties rather than holistic aesthetic judgment. Ablation studies confirm that the semantic parsing module constitutes the most critical component, and that multi-dimensional decomposition with adaptive weighting significantly surpasses monolithic scoring approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.