ArticleScientific reports2026
Label-free classification of breast cancer subtypes in ex vivo human tissues using Raman spectroscopy and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast conserving surgery (BCS) aims to excise breast tumors whilst preserving breast-related quality of life, but is complicated by the challenge of accurately identifying the margin between healthy and cancerous tissue. Raman spectroscopy (RS) has been shown to distinguish between normal breast tissue and breast cancer. Thus, this study aimed to further evaluate the diagnostic performance of RS in ex vivo breast tissue subtype classification via investigation of signals from healthy tissues and three breast cancer subtypes (invasive ductal carcinoma, IDC; invasive lobular carcinoma, ILC; and ductal carcinoma in situ, DCIS). A total of 80 tissue samples (46 normal and 34 cancerous) from 71 individuals were measured using a confocal Raman microscope. Spectral signatures were investigated, and supervised classification was performed for both two-class (healthy vs. cancer) and four-class (healthy vs. IDC vs. ILC vs. DCIS) classification tasks. RS successfully differentiated cancerous from normal breast tissue (97.84% sensitivity, 97.18% specificity). For four-class classification, RS achieved in-class sensitivity ranging from 83 to 96% and specificity from 93 to 99%. These findings demonstrate that RS can accurately distinguish normal from cancerous tissue and capture clinically relevant differences among histological subtypes, including invasive and pre-invasive disease, supporting its promise for intraoperative tissue characterization during BCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.