ArticleScientific reports2026
A study of the impacts sky view factor on urban environments and pedestrians' comforts.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban environmental quality (EnQ) encompassing thermal comfort and air quality is a critical determinant of urban livability. Global warming and urban heat island have sharpened their negative effects. The sky view factor (SVF), a key metric of urban geometry, is known to influence EnQ, but its integrated and context-dependent effects across different urban settings remain inadequately quantified. This study presents a comprehensive field measurement investigation in Chengdu, China, a humid subtropical megacity, employing a comparative approach with synchronized microclimate monitoring and extensive questionnaire surveys (N = 1692) across contrasting street and park settings. findings in this study reveal a fundamental context-dependency in both environmental mechanisms and human perception. Pedestrians exhibited high thermal sensitivity, with neutral physiologically equivalent temperatures (PET) of 24.2 °C in streets and a significantly lower 19.2 °C in parks. In contrast, sensitivity to air pollution was weaker, with a discomfort threshold for PM2.5 identified at 46 µg/m³. Crucially, the dominant factors shaping environmental quality diverged between settings: in streets, thermal comforts were primarily governed by surface albedo, whereas in parks, it was predominantly controlled by SVF. A striking paradox was observed for air quality; contrary to conventional understanding, multivariate analysis controlling for traffic variables showed that higher SVF was associated with increased PM2.5 concentrations in street canyons, yet it facilitated pollutant dispersion and improved air quality in the park. These findings underscore the complex and often countervailing interplay between urban form and environmental performance. The study provides a robust, evidence-based foundation for moving beyond one-size-fits-all solutions, advocating for context-sensitive urban design strategies that are precisely calibrated to the distinct environmental logic of streets and green spaces to enhance pedestrian comfort and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.