ArticleScientific reports2026
The Development and validation of an RP-HPLC-FD method for the multi-residue analysis of antiparasitic macrocycliclactones in cattle edible tissues.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of five macrocyclic lactones (ivermectin, abamectin, doramectin, moxidectin, and eprinomectin) in edible tissues (meat, liver, kidney, and fat) of cattle using a modified QuEChERS extraction procedure. Residue levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Recovery rates for all drugs across all edible tissues ranged from 73.91 to 96.15%. The limits of detection and quantification for macrocyclic lactones in cattle edible tissue samples ranged from 0.85 to 1.25 µg/kg and 2.55 to 3.80 µg/kg, respectively. Application of the method to real samples revealed the presence of macrocyclic lactone residues in 18 of 168 samples evaluated. One cattle meat sample (40 µg/kg, ivermectin) exceeded the maximum residue limit, while all other positive samples were below their respective maximum residue limits. This developed and validated method offers an alternative for the simultaneous analysis of multiple macrocyclic lactone residues in cattle edible tissues intended for human consumption, thanks to fewer processing steps, lower solvent volume, and fewer chemicals. Unlike other methods in the literature, this technique uses a very small sample amount (1 g) and solvent volume (3 ml). While these findings indicate that the developed method can be applied to detect macrocyclic lactone residues in edible tissues of cattle, potential matrix effects should be carefully evaluated, especially in matrices with high lipid content, such as adipose tissue (fat), given the target compounds high lipophilicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.