ArticleScientific reports2026
Culturally-Aware Prompting in conversational AI: supporting perceived communicative effectiveness in cross-cultural teams in Australia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With multilingual collaboration increasingly important in digital work environments, linguistic correctness is not sufficient any more for equitable and sustainable cross-cultural communication. This study empirically examines whether Culturally-Aware Prompting (CAP) can enhance the cultural appropriateness, pragmatic politeness, and collaborative effectiveness of conversational AI. In this study, CAP is defined as a structured prompt design approach that explicitly embeds cultural context into the instruction given to a language model. This study was conducted within Australia's culturally and linguistically diverse context. With a fully crossed experiment employing GPT-4o across three language pairs and four task types, finally generating 72 outputs, which were then evaluated through blind human ratings, automated politeness and semantic metrics, and statistical modelling. Results show that CAP significantly improves cultural appropriateness and pragmatic politeness without compromising semantic accuracy. Interaction analyses indicate that CAP produces stronger perceived benefits in language pairs and tasks with higher pragmatic sensitivity. Automated metrics broadly align with human ratings, although they are treated as complementary indicators rather than substitutes for human judgement. Mediation modelling further reveals that CAP enhances collaborative outcomes primarily by strengthening cultural and pragmatic alignment. These findings position CAP as a practical and scalable mechanism for fostering trust, reducing pragmatic friction, and supporting sustainable collaboration in multicultural teams. An empirically validated framework proposed by this study also lays a foundation for culturally adaptive AI communication design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.