ArticleScientific reports2026
Feature selection methodology based on explainable AI: application in predicting extubation success in the intensive care unit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-dimensional medical data hinder predictive modeling because of noise and the curse of dimensionality, making robust feature selection (FS) essential. We propose a model-agnostic feature selection method that aggregates three explainers-SHAP, LIME, and layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP)-into a consensus feature ranking and then reorders it using true-positive (TP)-specific attributions. Using the MIMIC-IV database, we analyzed 19,567 mechanically ventilated patients and trained a multilayer perceptron to predict extubation success. On the test set, the proposed XAI FS achieved an AUROC of 0.8527 [Formula: see text] and a sensitivity of [Formula: see text], performing comparably to conventional statistical, wrapper-based, and single-explainer FS methods while prioritizing a compact, highly interpretable, and clinically plausible feature subset. The key predictors closely matched established extubation readiness criteria, supporting their practical relevance. In additional experiments on seven other medical prediction datasets, the framework improved performance on most classification tasks, suggesting potential generalizability beyond extubation. These findings indicate that TP-focused, multi-explainer FS can provide robust, interpretable models and establish reliable consensus feature rankings in high-risk ICU decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.