ArticleNature communications2026
Independence and coherence in temporal sequence computation across the fronto-parietal network.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Independence and coherence in temporal sequence computation across the fronto-parietal network.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Time processing requires distributed and coordinated cortical dynamics, yet how multiple brain areas flexibly switch between coherent and independent temporal representations remains unclear. Using mesoscale two-photon calcium imaging, we simultaneously recorded neuronal populations in the secondary motor cortex and posterior parietal cortex of mice performing a novel alternating-interval timing task. Both areas encoded elapsed time through similar high-dimensional sequential activity, and decoding analyses revealed both coherent temporal errors shared across areas and independent errors confined to one area. Communication-subspace analysis showed that temporal information was distributed across multiple low-variance shared dimensions, whereas the dominant shared dimension preferentially encoded behaviour. A twin recurrent neural network model with sparse inter-network coupling and shared high-variance noise reproduced these experimental findings. Perturbation and local Lyapunov exponent analyses further showed that different shared subspaces selectively promote coherent or independent modes. These results reveal how sparse coupling and shared global fluctuations enable robust yet flexible fronto-parietal temporal computation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.