ArticleNature communications2026
Benchmarking large language models for cell-free RNA diagnostic biomarker discovery.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large language models can synthesize biomedical knowledge, parse vast amounts of data, and generate code, positioning them as promising tools for biomarker discovery from high-throughput omics data. Here, we benchmark six models from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google on plasma cell-free RNA datasets spanning three clinical cohorts: Kawasaki disease versus multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, active tuberculosis versus symptomatic respiratory controls, and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome versus sedentary controls. We evaluate literature-guided nomination of diagnostic gene panels for downstream machine learning and autonomous construction of end-to-end classifiers from raw count matrices to held-out test predictions. Despite prompt adherence issues, model-nominated panels recapitulate canonical immune pathways and outperform random panels across cohorts, even matching differential gene expression baselines in the tuberculosis cohort. End-to-end automation proves feasible but is model- and task-dependent. One model approaches conventional performance for Kawasaki disease versus multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, whereas performance decreases for tuberculosis and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome cohorts. These findings delineate current capabilities and limitations of large language models in diagnostics and open a path for their future use in biomarker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.