ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Hierarchical Reconfiguration of Neurocognitive Task Set Representations Mediates Cognitive Flexibility.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive control organizes abstract contexts, stimuli, and actions into hierarchically structured representations. This organization supports flexible behavior but requires updating at multiple levels of the hierarchy, a process reflected in task switch costs. However, it remains unclear how updating differs across levels of abstraction and how these differences relate to behavior and neural representations. Here, we investigated the behavioral and neural sources of switch costs using fMRI and behavioral data from healthy adult participants (male and female). We employed a hierarchical control task that dissociates abstract context reconfiguration from more concrete task-set reconfiguration of stimulus-response mappings. We predicted that task sets, which incorporate sensory-motor mappings, would be more strongly influenced by feedforward inputs than higher-level contextual goals, which are more abstracted from immediate perceptual and motor demands. As predicted, subordinate rule switches were faster and were more strongly influenced by task-irrelevant perceptual changes, whereas context switches were slower and relatively insensitive to such interference. To characterize the neural basis of these effects, we quantified trial-to-trial reconfiguration of multivoxel activity patterns. Across the brain, larger pattern shifts predicted larger RT switch costs, linking representational reorganization to behavioral performance. Importantly, representational reconfiguration differed across hierarchical levels and anatomical systems. Subordinate rule updating was modulated by task-irrelevant perceptual features and expressed in distributed perceptual and motor networks, whereas context reconfiguration engaged the mid-lateral frontal cortex and was comparatively insulated from interference. Our results reveal how the hierarchical structure of neural representations supports flexible updating with interference-shielded contextual representations subserving behavioral control.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.