ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2026
School funding and educational attainment in adolescence: a longitudinal ecological study of English local authorities from 2015 to 2023.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdequate education funding is important to reduce the socioeconomic inequality in educational attainment, an important social determinant of health. Over the past decade, there have been reductions in public funding for schools in England, despite the introduction of a national funding formula (NFF) policy, aimed at reducing historical differences in school funding. We assessed the impact of school spending cuts on student attainment at age 16, additionally by deprivation and pre-NFF and post-NFF policy implementation.
methodsOur longitudinal ecological study covers the period 2014/2015 to 2022/2023, analysed at local authority (LA) level. Our exposure was secondary school spending per pupil using school-level data, aggregated by LA and inflation adjusted. Our outcome was General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) attainment using average GCSE Attainment 8 scores across LAs. We used correlated random-effects regression to quantify the association between change in spending and change in GCSE attainment. We additionally analysed the association between spending cuts and attainment by LA deprivation, and before and after the NFF policy.
findingsBetween 2015 and 2023, per pupil school spending decreased by 13% from £6367 to £5556, while average GCSE attainment declined by 2.1 points from 48.5 to 46.4. A 10% spending cut was associated with a 0.42-point decrease in average attainment (95% CI 0.19 to 0.66). The estimates are different across LA deprivation quintile-based groups. Most deprived LAs had a greater impact (0.54; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.92), compared with least deprived LAs (-0.04; 95% CI -0.46 to 0.38). The association after the NFF policy was not different from the pre-NFF period (p=0.639).
conclusionSchool spending cuts were associated with decreased GCSE attainment across England, with a bigger impact in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Against a backdrop of spending cuts, NFF introduction did not narrow inequities in attainment. More equitable school investment is critical to improving attainment and reducing inequalities across the life course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.