ArticleRMD open2026
[
Article in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing disease activity in giant cell arteritis (GCA) remains challenging, as existing clinical, laboratory and imaging biomarkers lack specificity. This proof-of-concept study explored the diagnostic potential of vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) targeting [
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed GCA underwent [
resultsEight patients with newly diagnosed GCA were compared with eight relapsing patients, alongside eight controls. Imaging revealed a positive association between ultrasound-assessed subclavian artery intima-media thickness and tracer uptake (r=0.67, p=0.035). Prednisolone exposure was inversely associated with vascular uptake across various vascular regions, with SUVmean showing a stronger overall negative association than SUVmax (SUVmean r=-0.51, p=0.043; SUVmax r=-0.62, p=0.010). Levels of sVAP-1 were reduced in newly diagnosed GCA compared with relapsing patients (p=0.0145) and controls (p=0.0446), and inversely associated with MMP2 (r=-0.56, p=0.037) and MMP9 (r=-0.47, p=0.089). Notably, MMP2 and MMP3 were negatively associated with vascular uptake (eg, aortic arch: r=-0.59, p=0.027).
conclusionsThis first-in-human study demonstrates that [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.