Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275901›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2026

"So what's gonna happen when I get out of here?" Qualitative barriers and facilitators to MOUD continuity post-release from jail.

Thomas J Stopka, Rebecca E Rottapel, Morgan Ruggiro, Claudia Santelices, Peter D Friedmann, Ekaterina Pivovarova, Elizabeth A Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas J StopkaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, United States. Electronic address: Thomas.Stopka@tufts.edu.
Rebecca E RottapelDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
Morgan RuggiroDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, United States.
Claudia SantelicesUrban Health Research and Practice, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Peter D FriedmannDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Science, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.
Ekaterina PivovarovaDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.
Elizabeth A EvansDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 312 Arnold House, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA 01003, United States.

Funding

Massachusetts Justice Cooperative Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) Research CenterUG1DA050067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI EVANS, ELIZABETH A., FRIEDMANN, PETER D · 2019 to 2023
$10.5M
NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment is increasingly available within jails, but little is known about patient experiences regarding treatment continuity post-release.

methodsBetween 2021 and 2022, we interviewed 38 recently-released people who received MOUD in Massachusetts county jails. We asked participants about their experiences with reentry and MOUD continuity post-release. Thematic analyses were framed by the social-ecological model.

resultsAt the individual-interpersonal level, participants reported the importance of self-advocacy during incarceration to plan for post-release MOUD treatment continuity. They cited increasing awareness of diminished opioid tolerance as a risk factor for post-release overdose. Participants reported hopelessness about recovery when returning to communities saturated with substance use-related triggers. Participants recognized social support systems as crucial. At the organizational level, participants reported variation by facility in reentry assistance. Detail-oriented reentry teams, active outreach, follow through, clear communication, caring attitudes, and early initiation of reentry planning were key to filling gaps in treatment post-release. Community-level themes emphasized the importance of communication between jail staff and community providers to schedule appointments and provide transportation. At the policy level, advanced reentry planning is needed to avoid treatment lapses, including assistance with health insurance reactivation and bridge prescriptions during the transition from jail-based to community-based MOUD.

conclusionParticipants recognized the high risk of MOUD treatment lapses during transitions from jail to community reentry, and valued MOUD continuity services initiated during incarceration and continued post-release. Variation in patient-reported quality of reentry planning services underscored the need for more standardized investment in re-entry and treatment continuity services.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPrisonersAdultFemaleHumansJailsMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial SupportDrug treatmentJailsMassachusettsMedication for opioid use disorder (MOUD)Qualitative

Identifiers

PMID42275901
PMCPMC13390560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.