Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42275607›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2026

Event rates in major Phase 3 heart failure trials over the last 20 years.

Alberto Aimo, Giorgia Panichella, Andrea Ripoli, Guiomar Mendieta Badimon, Faiez Zannad, Michele Emdin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto AimoInterdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9129-9519
Giorgia PanichellaCardiology Department, Careggi University Hospital, Largo G.A. Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Andrea RipoliCardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Guiomar Mendieta BadimonDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), CIBER CV, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Faiez ZannadUniversité de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
Michele EmdinInterdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo determine whether control-arm event rates in heart failure (HF) randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in New England Journal of Medicine from 2004 to 2024 declined over time, despite intensification of background therapy.

methodsWe identified Phase 3 HF RCTs published in New England Journal of Medicine (2004-24). Annualized event rates were calculated as events divided by patients multiplied by follow-up to the primary endpoint. Temporal trends were analysed with weighted least squares (weights equal to the number of control-arm patients), with adjustment for follow-up duration.

resultsThirty-eight trials met criteria; 31 enrolled HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; 82%). In HFrEF control arms, median age was 67 years [interquartile range (IQR) 64-69], women were 24% (IQR 21-30), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 28% (25-31), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was 1700 ng/L (1273-2879), and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV was 46% (29-71). Background therapy included β-blockers 91% (82-93), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors 93% (90-97), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) 52% (42-59). The median control-arm size was 602 patients (308-1533). Across years, therapy use rose (β-blockers +1.04 percentage points per year, P < .001; MRAs +2.05 percentage points per year, P < .001), LVEF increased (+.22% per year, P = .012), NT-proBNP increased (∼+11.4% per year on the log scale, P = .004), and follow-up tended to shorten (P = .052). In control arms, all-cause mortality showed no temporal decline [unadjusted slope +.0019 per year; 95% confidence interval (CI) -.0013 to +.0051; P = .252]; after adjusting for follow-up, the slope was +.0006 per year (P = .711). Longer follow-up was associated with lower annualized mortality (coefficient -.0195 per year; P = .032). Cardiovascular mortality was stable (unadjusted +.0003 per year; 95% CI -.0036 to +.0042; P = .898; follow-up-adjusted -.0012 per year; P = .557). The composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization increased unadjusted (+.0180 per year; 95% CI +.0063 to +.0298; P = .011) but was not significant after follow-up adjustment (+.0113 per year; P = .111). Enrichment intensity did not rise linearly (coefficient +.032 criteria per year; P = .111), whereas natriuretic-peptide cut-offs were adopted more often [odds ratio (OR) per decade 14.09; 95% CI 1.93-102.75; P = .009). Higher age related to higher mortality (coefficient +.0039 per year; P = .043). An interaction between year and log-transformed NT-proBNP indicated risk-dependent temporal patterns (P = .003).

conclusionIn major HFrEF trials, control-arm mortality did not decline from 2004 to 2024 despite greater uptake of evidence-based therapy. Risk-enriched enrolment and shorter follow-up likely counterbalanced therapeutic gains.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHeart FailureRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftFemaleHumansNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNatriuretic Peptide, BrainHeart failureMortalityRandomized controlled trialsSurvivalTherapyTrial design

Identifiers

PMID42275607
PMCPMC13298876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.