ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Gene loss and compensatory evolution as a source of metabolic preadaptations.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene loss is common, yet whether it is merely an evolutionary dead-end or can promote future adaptation to new environments remains debated. Here, we systematically tested whether harmful loss of metabolic genes, followed by compensatory evolution, generates preadaptations to alternative nutrients in Escherichia coli. Our analysis revealed a striking outcome beyond simple growth restoration, where repair of a genetic defect yielded growth exceeding the unperturbed wild type on carbon sources not encountered during evolution. Such latent growth gains occurred across multiple deletion backgrounds and carbon sources, with growth rate increases up to 46% relative to the wild type. In some cases, the corresponding ancestral deletion strain failed to grow on these carbon sources, indicating functional innovations relative to the deletion ancestor. Genetic reconstruction and transcriptomic profiling implicate regulatory reprogramming, particularly in carbon catabolite repression and nutrient uptake, as mechanisms underlying latent growth gains. In conclusion, evolutionary recovery from gene loss can rapidly produce preadaptations to future environments in the absence of direct selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.