ArticleHepatology communications2026
Two-step care pathways for advanced MASLD in primary and hospital care: A multicenter study.
Article in Hepatology communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) fibrosis may prevent liver-related morbidity and mortality. We investigated the effectiveness of multiple 2-step approaches for detecting at-risk advanced MASLD fibrosis, defined as a hierarchical clinical score comprising liver histology and VCTE depending on availability, in primary and hospital outpatient care.
methodsPatients at risk for MASLD were recruited from general practices and regional and tertiary internal medicine clinics, after excluding other liver diseases. Simultaneous measurement of non-invasive tests (NITs), including fibrosis-4 score (FIB4), metabolic dysfunction-associated fibrosis-5 score (MAF5), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test, procollagen type III N-terminal propeptide (PRO-C3), procollagen type VI N-terminal propeptide (PRO-C6), and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), allowed testing of 2-step referral pathways. Referral patterns were compared with regular care between 2016 and 2024 using a predefined reference standard.
resultsAmong 595 participants, 9.4% were at-risk of advanced MASLD fibrosis. A care pathway consisting of FIB4 (≥1.30) followed by VCTE yielded the greatest improvement, increasing the correct referral rate 5.0-fold (95% CI: 2.4-10.1) compared with regular care. However, care pathways incorporating MAF5 (≥1.0) or NFS (≥-1.455) followed by VCTE demonstrated markedly higher sensitivity at comparable increases in detection (both >4.5-fold). Among other second-step NITs, PRO-C3 outperformed ELF, PRO-C6, and ADAPT, resulting in a 2.2-fold (95% CI: 1.1-4.4) increase in correct referrals when used after FIB4 (≥1.30).
conclusionTwo-step care pathways substantially improve the detection of at-risk advanced MASLD fibrosis across care settings. Pathways using FIB4, MAF5, or NFS followed by VCTE offer the best performance overall, while PRO-C3 is the most effective alternative blood-based second-step test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.